← Back
YouTube Community Guidelines, Policy Violations, Strikes & Appeal Mechanics

A fitness video mentions supplements and receives a health-policy restriction despite avoiding treatment claims.

Problem

A fitness video mentions supplements and receives a health-policy restriction despite avoiding treatment claims.

Solution

Root Cause / Diagnostic:
Automated text and audio crawlers cross-reference brand names, dietary compounds, and chemical ingredients against extensive pharmaceutical watchlists. Mentioning specific performance-enhancing substances, fat burners, or restricted compounds—even neutrally—triggers automated drug and supplement policy flags.

Actionable Fix:
1. Identify any mentioned dietary ingredients, proprietary blends, or brand names that intersect with restricted or unregulated supplement lists (e.g., DMAA, SARMs, prohormones).
2. Appeal the enforcement by demonstrating that mentioned compounds are legal dietary supplements and that the video makes zero clinical or pharmacological performance claims.
3. Edit the video description and pinned comment to strip out any direct affiliate links or discount codes pointing to third-party supplement vendors flagged by safety filters.

Pro Tip:
When reviewing fitness supplements, stick strictly to general nutritional terminology (e.g., "creatine monohydrate", "whey protein isolate") and avoid linking to multi-brand storefronts that stock banned chemical compounds.